Nonpolarity
For a couple of days this week I was in Manhattan at the Center for Foreign Relations where Richard Haas is President. It was fun. It was on religion and foreign policy. I got to be with some friends and meet new friends. Hopefully I’ll be able to fill you in on some of them in a few days and things I learned from them.
Richard has been writing on the “Age of Nonpolarity.” The article is in the May/June issue of the probably the best for affairs magazine around called “Foreign Affairs!” Here’s the link. The premise of which ”the world is not dominated by one or two or even several states but rather by dozens of actors possessing and exercising various kinds of power. This represents a tectonic shift from the past.”
It fascinated me because it is how I see the world operating and how we do global engagement in the domains of society. I’m in the editing process on my fourth book – and I literally draw diagrams to illustrate what Richard is talking about.
So what will faith look like in this ever connected global world? Go to the link, read the article and let’s translate it in to a “faith response.” What about Richard’s conclusions? Agree or disagree?


Comments
Jul 18, 2008 at 05:49 PM
we are global citizens.
Jul 18, 2008 at 09:22 PM
Yes we are bippy!
Jul 19, 2008 at 10:07 AM
that has some serious ramifications for our response to people both local and global.
Jul 20, 2008 at 12:05 AM
So Richard wants more global integration action rather than nonpolarity, which is happening? I do agree when he said that the US needs to "get its own house in order"... If I understood this correctly, he's wanting the power to be shifted back to the US rather than little chunks here and there? It's about money and oil!
How do I translate that to "faith response"? If we are global citizens, we will have to answer to the world court and international laws. They don't even like homeschooling... That's not good.
Now I don't even know if I'm on the same track....
Jul 21, 2008 at 04:17 PM
I am curious of what the controversy is over the world court and international laws? Why is that something we have to fear? We give up liberties for organized government all the time...how much more would we really have to give up?
Jul 21, 2008 at 11:55 PM
Well, we know that the US is not functioning under the International court of justice, but it has actually been quite common that liberal judges in US courts to adopt International laws for their agenda. Focus on the family calls that judicial tyranny. These international laws cover a wide range of issues such as homeschooling, abortion, parental rights, definition of marriage... etc. Some liberal judges don't even need to be adopting international laws to change things around nowadays. Like that colorado bill SB200 pushed by rich billionaires, which opens bathrooms to any genders. Or the traditional marriage in California outruled 4-3 and many more cases like that. If judges start using international laws, we will lose A LOT.
Jul 22, 2008 at 07:32 PM
He is wrong. There is one monopolar center of power ...WALMART. Period/End of Story.
Leave a Reply